In the crazy world in which we live, a blog looking to make sense of it all.

Wednesday, April 26, 2006

Where There's Smoke

This is a topic I've wanted to blog about for a while now. The issue of smoking bans which are now found in 17 different states and 461 towns and cities, according to an Associated Press story in Sunday's Peoria Journal Star.

I'm a bit divided on this issue. Since I'm a non-smoker, I believe it would be great to go anywhere and not be bothered by smoke emitted by tobacco. However, what right does the government have to dictate to business owners to what their customers and employees may do. More specifically, I'm referring to restaurants and bars.

I can understand locations to where individuals have to travel to take care of certain needs and business, i.e. a county courthouse, grocery store, post office. But as for bars and restaurants, this is more of a want rather than a need, at least for a customer. If there is a tavern with a number of cigarette smokers, no one is forcing you to go in. If you don't like the smoke, then don't go in. If tavern owners knew that smoke-free bars were all the rage and huge money makers, we'd see a few more of them by now. This should be up to the tavern owner, since most of his/her clientele are most probably smokers.

During 1933 to 1945, Nazi Germany under the rule of Adolf Hitler enacted a smoking ban. The reason was to foster the health of Germans; moreover, Hitler wanted a master race of purity and quality. It is postulated that Hitler feared that intellectuals, who often smoked in those days, would assemble and would think up ideas not conductive to what Hitler had in mind for his 1,000 year Reich. It was recorded that smoking rates increased during the first 6 years of Hitler's rule, most probably it served as a form of resistance. The tobacco supporters often cite this fact, however, smoking bans of today have nothing in common with Hitler's ban. It is more about protecting the health of non-smokers.

I believe the best compromise is to allow exempt status for certain businesses, such as bars and restaurants; smoke shops for sure. Let these business owners decide what they wish to have; necessitate that proper signage is displayed so patrons will know what type of establishment to expect.

Common Sense of it All: It seems little by little, we lose more of our freedoms and rights. We now have to wear seat belts in our own cars, which is our personal property. Children must wear helmets on bikes and sit in car seats. While these are sensible and practical things to do, we are being legislated to do it. Careful. Today it's a total smoking ban in all public places, tomorrow it may be your home.

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Despite the huge numbers claimed by anti-smoking zealots, looking at it as an engineering problem, I fail to see how if 100% of all smokers don't get cancer, the dose non-smokers get (a small fraction of what the smoker inhales) can be causing all that much trouble.

April 26, 2006 3:26 PM

 
Blogger Laura Petelle said...

I think they should just charge for smoking licenses for bars and restaurants, the same as they do liquor licenses. When travelling in Ireland last year - now entirely smoke-free in pubs - it was actually LOVELY and several pub owners told us they were doing a bigger business: the smokers now stepped out for smoke breaks, and the non-smokers had come back and were spending a lot more time and money.

So rather than a smoking ban, which in the abstract I favor but in the concrete I think is too much government interference, why not just charge a licensing fee for a bar or restaurant to allow smoking? Some will get the license, some won't, some will do better business than others, we'll all learn through experimentation, and the city will make money off it besides so they could, you know, fix Fire Station 11. Or beautify more streets. Whatever.

April 26, 2006 11:49 PM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home