In the crazy world in which we live, a blog looking to make sense of it all.

Friday, March 30, 2007

SB 500 Passes

Illinois Senate Bill 500 advanced yesterday with a 34-23 vote. This bill is a statewide smoking ban bill which would outlaw smoking in all public places, including restaurants and bars.

You hear about all these smoking bans and it is played up as really popular and wanted. This bill passed with just shy of 60%; not actually a landslide margin. The House has a bill in the works but has not been voted upon yet.

Doesn't this state already have enough bad legislation in place? I am a non-smoker and I do not agree with these smoking bans in restaurants, bars and such. While I favor smoking bans in most public places, especially where individuals have legitimate business to do, restaurants and bars are completely elective places to frequent. Additionally, I would favor that these establishments place signage indicating whether they are a smoking or smoke free environment. This way, the individual and the business owner decides who to cater to and which establishment to enter; not the government.

Furthermore, smoking bans are just another step to losing our freedoms. Last I checked, using tobacco was legal for adults. But before long, there will be a smoking ban in your own home. Don't think it's possible? The government came into our own automobiles and mandated that we wear seat belts. Sure it's a smart and safe thing to do, but what right does the government have to make you to do this? It's your car! It's your life! Just wait until someone crys out that smokers who smoke in the privacy of their own home are hurting their kids, pets, guests, whatever.

The Illinois legislature is setting up another Prohibition. People will continue to smoke, whether it's in their favorite watering hole or in a back room speakeasy. How well will this smoking ban be enforced? That probably depends upon the local municipality. And along state borders, they'll simply drive over the state line and give adjacent states the sales tax revenue.

And just one question I'd like to ask these non-smoking proponents of the smoking ban; are you going to now patronize several seedy, hole in the wall, dives that were once filled with smokers once this ban goes into effect? I'm going to guess not; they will continue to frequent the Starbucks, TGI Fridays, country clubs and other establishments which are already non-smoking by choice. Maybe these smoking bans should enforce its supporters to regularly visit these taverns as they'll need the business.

The sarcastic, wise ass in me says that those who really want this smoking ban are those same people in high school and college who saw you and your friends having fun, but then called the cops or the Dean to rat you out because they couldn't stand to see someone else having a good time. These people's asses are so tight that it is impossible for them to have fun and thus, they want to ruin it for everyone.

4 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Losing our freedoms? That is a superficial way of looking at things.The Federalist Papers say our Constitution was founded on the notion that you have the freedom to do as you please so long as you do not infringe on other people's rights. Smoking infriges on everyone eles's rights who comes in contact with it. Including restaurant staff. As for restaurants being "elective" places to visit, that does not mean anything goes there. Why should smokers have special rights for their filthy habits? Why not also have special sections in all restaurants for people who want to masturbate while eating? Masturbation is not illegal so why not be allowed to do it in a restaurant? For that matter it is not illegal to walk barefoot. It is however illegal to enter a restaurant barefoot because it is unhealthy. Yet it doesn't cause cancer. How about also having barefoot or shirtless sections in restaurants in addition to special sections for smokers and public masturbators. None of those activities are appropriate in places people eat, including smoking. It's called civilized behavior and respecting the rights of others.

April 08, 2007 6:50 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm with you. I'm tired of a few people making decisions that will affect thousands of people. This is just one more right that is being taken from us. When the bars, restaurants, and other establishments start closing up because there's no smoking, who do you think will be penalized financially? Us--that's who. The government has no problem making us pay extra tax on those cigarettes. What's next: outlaw fast food, alcohol, lottery, etc.? I would've never thought the world would be like this 20 years ago. There's no way I would bring another child into this world, period.

Charleston, IL

May 02, 2007 9:36 AM

 
Blogger Common Sense Dude said...

Anon #1 –

Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for non-smoking in many public places such as schools, libraries, municipal buildings, etc. But I feel it unnecessary to initiate state law to ban smoking in places like restaurants and bars. That is because these places are in essence private businesses. And let the business owner decide whether they want to allow smoking or not, and their customers to decide if they want to patronize them.

You state… “For that matter it is not illegal to walk barefoot. It is however illegal to enter a restaurant barefoot because it is unhealthy.” I can go into Club Cabaret and get a prime rib dinner while looking at naked women. Why is that allowed and acceptable? I know exactly what I’m getting well before I walk in that door. To provide a particular entertainment and atmosphere is the decision of the owner and those whom he/she employs. It is also my decision to enter that business to enjoy what they offer.

Assume there is a tavern, and its owner and its small crew of employees smoke, as well as its several dozen regulars. They all know the hazards of smoking and still choose to continue this nasty habit. Non-smokers never come into the place so no one is bothered by the second hand smoke. The place is renowned for its smoker population. So why should they be forced by the government not to be allowed to smoke? The owner is not allowed to smoke in his own property even when no one opposes that he does? Who are these smokers bothering anyway?

My resolve did not call for the need to create more laws and more government. Place the no smoking ban but exempt restaurants, bars, tobacco shops and private clubs. In turn, these establishments must place signage indicating whether they allow smoking, strictly non-smoking or smoking sections available. This way, the small business owner decides how to run their business and the customer is aware of what to expect and can then decide whether to patronize the establishment. Let individuals and free market decide. Sure, it might be a health issue, but with this solution, individuals have the freedom to choose what is best for them and for what they want… and NOT THE GOVERNMENT.

May 02, 2007 8:29 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

anonymous said, "For that matter it is not illegal to walk barefoot. It is however illegal to enter a restaurant barefoot because it is unhealthy."

It is not illegal to enter a restaurant barefoot. That is a myth. At least it is not anywhere in the United States, I don't know about other countries. Look it up.

September 25, 2007 6:42 AM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home